Subject	+43 rear for 10", IMO (n/m)
Posted by	BigTDogg (MA) on February 13, 2006 at 10:11 AM
	This message has been viewed 22 times.
In Reply To	+37 front for 8.5", +41 rear for 10". Plus/minus 2. (n/m) posted by Scotts94z32 on February 13, 2006 at 09:57 AM
Message
Follow Ups	How much will my acceleration be effected.... - scoTTinald (BC) 22:51:36 02/12/06 Re: How much will my acceleration be effected.... (n/m) - 604Z 22:57:16 02/12/06 unless your talking tenths of a second at the strip, your - SnowManZ(aka Snowie) 23:00:21 02/12/06 Nice choice - Ebola (Calgary, AB) 23:02:46 02/12/06 PS: Im hoping I'll get to see them mid July in Kelowna. - Ebola (Calgary, AB) 23:11:33 02/12/06 As I am looking to see those GT-C's of yours :-) (n/m) - scoTTinald (BC) 23:39:47 02/12/06 blurry yet great (In My Perception) pic leaving Kelowna - Zlicious (Seattle) 04:47:14 02/13/06 Re: How much will my acceleration be effected.... - 604Z 23:07:40 02/12/06 There are a few good shops in Van city... - scoTTinald (BC) 23:41:43 02/12/06 It depends on what the wheel weighs.... - Player 23:13:32 02/12/06 every 5 lbs. is 1 tenth off your 0-60. - jmw23712 23:19:08 02/12/06 can this be confirmed? it sounds BS to me. - SnowManZ(aka Snowie) 23:52:48 02/12/06 I think he's talking about 5lbs off the wheels. - DMoneyTT (formerly 90na) 23:56:15 02/12/06 when I go back and read it I think it is off the wheels - SnowManZ(aka Snowie) 00:00:35 02/13/06 yes, that is 5 lbs on the wheels. - jmw23712 00:47:59 02/13/06 Yeah that makes a lot more sense =) (n/m) - SeedyROM 01:39:33 02/13/06 It's 100lbs for .1 off your quarter-mile - SeedyROM 00:02:40 02/13/06 I do not notice them slowing me down, instead I feel them - CHUNG (Dallas) 23:19:17 02/12/06 what kind of tires were you using on the stockers? - scoTTinald (BC) 23:49:09 02/12/06 eek (n/m) - Guapo 23:55:52 02/12/06 Yeah, I tend to drive like my Grandma... (n/m) - scoTTinald (BC) 00:01:55 02/13/06 Falken FK451, Ventus K104, Kumho 711/712, Dunlop SP8000 - CHUNG (Dallas) 00:03:20 02/13/06 Uh Huh :( do you have an auto? - DMoneyTT (formerly 90na) 00:04:38 02/13/06 no, shes a 5 speed. - scoTTinald (BC) 00:13:15 02/13/06 you wont even notice...after stage 3 its impossbile to - TWINTURBONICK 23:21:18 02/12/06 I noticed the difference in handling more than the - robo (sebring1970) 23:22:30 02/12/06 "Yokohama AVS ES 100's" :) (n/m) - Guapo 23:23:59 02/12/06 for better or worse, they were a constant in the formula (n/m) - robo (sebring1970) 23:38:28 02/12/06 well hell ... so they're inconsistent too? :) (n/m) - Guapo 23:56:21 02/12/06 having run through about eight of them I will share with - robo (sebring1970) 03:42:32 02/13/06 +40 in the front? Sounds like a lot to me... (n/m) - Scotts94z32 23:24:32 02/12/06 what would you recommend then? :-) (n/m) - scoTTinald (BC) 23:38:52 02/12/06 +37 front for 8.5", +41 rear for 10". Plus/minus 2. (n/m) - Scotts94z32 09:57:19 02/13/06 +43 rear for 10", IMO (n/m) - BigTDogg (MA) 10:11:56 02/13/06 *Update* - scoTTinald (BC) 00:00:12 02/13/06 Why are you guessing on the offsets? - NytWolf 00:12:19 02/13/06 Not guessing...TwinTurboNick said that those are his offsets - scoTTinald (BC) 00:16:28 02/13/06 here, all the offsets available for F/R: - CHUNG (Dallas) 00:44:05 02/13/06 Damn TTNick..haha - scoTTinald (BC) 03:13:32 02/13/06 I run a +33 in the front on 18x8.5's w/o issue - BigTDogg (MA) 13:58:18 02/13/06 Forget all these rules of thumb, the moment of inertia - CaliguyPurdue 02:04:06 02/13/06
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.